Enterprise AI Coding: Copilot vs Sourcegraph Amp vs Tabnine (Updated Feb 2026)

Enterprise buyers need security, deployment flexibility, and predictable pricing---not demos. This guide focuses on three leading enterprise options and what each verifiably offers in February 2026.

Quick Comparison

GitHub Copilot Business and Enterprise

Pricing

• Business: $19/user/month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing (contact sales)
• Free 30-day org trials typically available

Where It Fits

Teams already on GitHub that want the lowest friction rollout and, for Enterprise, deep GitHub.com integration.

Key Capabilities

• Chat and completions in VS Code, JetBrains, and Visual Studio
• Policy controls to block public code suggestions
• SSO/SAML and org-wide license management
• Enterprise adds GitHub.com integration: PR summaries, issue/discussion Q&A, repo-aware chat
• Data from Business/Enterprise accounts is not used to train foundation models (per GitHub policy)

Trade-offs

Cloud-only with no self-hosting or BYO model option. Strongest for GitHub-centric organizations; limited for mixed VCS environments.

Sourcegraph Amp (formerly Cody)

Pricing

Contact sales. No public per-seat pricing. Free enterprise trials are available with unlimited access for a defined engineering group.

Where It Fits

Large, multi-repo codebases that benefit from Sourcegraph's code graph and enterprises needing self-hosted or private cloud deployment.

Key Capabilities

• Code graph context: Sourcegraph's code graph and search provide highly relevant responses across large mono-repos and multi-repo setups
• Agentic coding flows: Amp mode for autonomous multi-step tasks plus chat/completions in IDE and web
• Deployment flexibility: Self-hosted, private cloud, or managed; admin controls for model/repo policies and auditability
• VCS integration: Works with GitHub, GitLab, and existing Sourcegraph search infrastructure
• Enterprise trials: Includes hands-on guidance for configuring agents and workflows

Trade-offs

Requires Sourcegraph deployment and a contract. Best returns for organizations with large codebases that already use (or plan to adopt) Sourcegraph.

Tabnine

Pricing

Contact sales for custom pricing. Tabnine has moved to a quote-based model with no publicly listed per-seat rates. Enterprise/VPC/on-prem available.

Where It Fits

Privacy-first and regulated environments that require zero data retention and on-prem or VPC deployment.

Key Capabilities

• Enterprise Context Engine: Builds a structured model of your architecture, dependencies, and standards for more accurate suggestions
• Agentic platform: AI agents for reviews, tests, and refactors with org policy controls
• Deployment options: SaaS, VPC, on-prem, or air-gapped; zero data egress architecture
• Security posture: SOC 2/ISO, zero data retention option, RBAC, audit logging
• Model approach: Works with multiple LLMs; customers choose their model with no hidden markups
• Reported outcomes: Up to 50% faster resolution, 80% token reduction, 2x agent accuracy (per Tabnine benchmarks)

Trade-offs

Higher cost than Copilot Business. Smaller ecosystem than GitHub-native tools. Requires sales engagement for pricing.

Head-to-Head Comparisons

Amp vs Copilot Enterprise

Choose Amp for on-prem deployment and code graph context. Choose Copilot Enterprise for GitHub.com-native workflows.

Tabnine vs Amp

Copilot Business vs Enterprise

Decision Guide

Sources

• GitHub Copilot plans: github.com/features/copilot/plans
• Sourcegraph Amp: sourcegraph.com/amp and sourcegraph.com/contact/amp-enterprise-trial
• Tabnine pricing and security: tabnine.com/pricing-enterprise-context-engine and tabnine.com/security

Need help choosing? Explore our full directory for detailed reviews and comparisons of all enterprise AI coding tools.