Enterprise AI Coding: GitHub Copilot vs Sourcegraph Amp (Cody) vs Tabnine (Dec 2025)
Up-to-date comparison of enterprise AI coding assistants in December 2025: GitHub Copilot Business/Enterprise, Sourcegraph Amp (formerly Cody), and Tabnine.
Editorial Team
The AI Coding Tools Directory editorial team researches, tests, and reviews AI-powered development tools to help developers find the best solutions for their workflows.
Introduction
Enterprise buyers prioritize security, deployment flexibility, and predictable pricing over flashy demos. This December 2025 update focuses on three leading options: GitHub Copilot Business/Enterprise, Sourcegraph Amp (formerly Cody), and Tabnine. We highlight what’s verifiably offered today—pricing, hosting models, admin controls—and trim speculative claims.
Quick Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Sourcegraph Amp (Cody) | Tabnine | GitHub Copilot Business | GitHub Copilot Enterprise | |---------|-----------------------|---------|-------------------------|---------------------------| | Pricing | Contact sales (no public per-seat) | $59/user/mo (annual) | $19/user/mo | $39/user/mo | | Hosting | Self-hosted or private cloud; managed available | SaaS, VPC, on-prem | SaaS (GitHub cloud) | SaaS (GitHub cloud) | | Models | Frontier/enterprise models with Sourcegraph context; provider flexibility | Tabnine proprietary models; zero-retention option | GitHub-managed OpenAI models | Same models plus GitHub.com context | | SSO/SAML | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Admin/Policies | Yes (repo/model policies, RBAC) | Yes (role-based policies) | Yes (org policies, block public code) | Yes (org policies + GitHub.com features) | | Data Residency/Self-host | Supported (self-host/VPC) | Supported (VPC/on-prem) | Cloud-only | Cloud-only | | Best For | Large/complex codebases needing Sourcegraph context + self-host | Privacy-first, regulated, air-gapped/VPC | GitHub-first teams needing fast rollout | GitHub-first teams wanting GitHub.com chat/PR features |
1) GitHub Copilot Business & Enterprise
Pricing (public): Business $19/user/month; Enterprise $39/user/month. Free 30-day trials are typically available for orgs.
Where it fits: Teams already on GitHub that want the lowest friction rollout and deep GitHub.com integration (Enterprise).
Key capabilities:
- IDE chat/completions with policy controls (block public code suggestions).
- SSO/SAML and org-wide licensing.
- Enterprise tier adds GitHub.com integration (PR summaries, issue/discussion Q&A, repo-aware chat) and higher admin controls.
- Data from Business/Enterprise is not used to train foundation models (per GitHub policy).
Trade-offs: Cloud-only; no self-host or BYO model. Strongest for GitHub-centric orgs; limited for mixed VCS environments.
2) Sourcegraph Amp (formerly Cody)
Pricing: Contact sales (Sourcegraph no longer lists per-seat pricing for Amp/Cody). Free credits/trials are common; production use is contracted.
Where it fits: Large, multi-repo codebases that benefit from Sourcegraph’s code graph and enterprises needing self-host/VPC deployment.
Key capabilities:
- Sourcegraph context (code graph, search) for more relevant responses on big mono/multi-repos.
- Agentic coding flows (Amp) plus chat/completions in IDE and web.
- Deployment flexibility: self-host or private cloud; admin controls for models/repos and auditability.
- Integrates with GitHub/GitLab and existing Sourcegraph search.
Trade-offs: Requires Sourcegraph deployment and contract; pricing not public. Best returns for large codebases that already use Sourcegraph or need on-prem.
3) Tabnine (Enterprise/Agentic Platform)
Pricing (public): $59/user/month (annual) for the agentic platform; enterprise/VPC/on-prem via sales. No freemium for enterprise use.
Where it fits: Privacy-first and regulated environments that want zero-retention options and on-prem/VPC deployment.
Key capabilities:
- Tabnine proprietary models tuned for code; agentic workflows (reviews, tests, refactors) with org policy controls.
- Deployment options: SaaS, VPC, or on-prem; zero data retention and SOC 2/ISO posture.
- SSO/SAML, RBAC, and audit logging.
Trade-offs: Higher list price than Copilot; smaller ecosystem than GitHub; proprietary models only (no BYO frontier model).
Head-to-Head Comparisons
Amp (Cody) vs Copilot Enterprise
| Factor | Amp (Cody) | Copilot Enterprise | |--------|------------|-------------------| | Price | Contract | $39/user | | Hosting | Self-host/VPC or managed | Cloud-only | | Context | Sourcegraph code graph/search | GitHub.com repo/indexing | | Best for | Large multi-repo, on-prem | GitHub-centric SaaS teams |
Takeaway: Choose Amp for on-prem + large codebase context; choose Copilot Enterprise for GitHub-native workflows.
Tabnine vs Amp (Cody)
| Factor | Tabnine | Cody | |--------|---------|------| | Price | $59/user (annual) | Contract | | Hosting | SaaS/VPC/on-prem | Self-host/VPC/managed | | Models | Tabnine proprietary | Frontier mix + Sourcegraph context | | Best for | Privacy-first, air-gapped | Complex codebases needing graph context |
Copilot Business vs Enterprise
| Factor | Business | Enterprise | |--------|----------|------------| | Price | $19/user | $39/user | | GitHub.com integration | IDE-focused | Adds PR/issue/wiki chat | | Custom context | Repo-aware via IDE | Repo-aware + GitHub.com | | Best for | Cost-conscious GitHub teams | Heavy GitHub.com users |
Sources & Further Reading
- GitHub Copilot pricing and plan details: https://github.com/features/copilot/plans
- GitHub Copilot Enterprise features (GitHub.com integrations): https://github.blog/
- Sourcegraph Amp/Cody enterprise overview and pricing/contact: https://sourcegraph.com/amp and https://sourcegraph.com/contact/sales
- Tabnine pricing and deployment options: https://tabnine.com/pricing and https://tabnine.com/security
Need help choosing an enterprise AI coding tool? Explore our full directory for detailed reviews and comparisons.
Tools Mentioned in This Article
Frequently Asked Questions
Which option is lowest cost for enterprises?
Which tools offer self-hosting or private deployment?
Can I control which models run?
Which is best for GitHub-centric teams?
Which is best for regulated or air-gapped environments?
Explore More AI Coding Tools
Browse our comprehensive directory of AI-powered development tools, IDEs, and coding assistants.
Browse All Tools