Comparison

Cursor vs VS Code: Do You Need an AI-Native IDE? (2026)

A practical comparison of Cursor and VS Code: when to choose an AI-first IDE versus staying in VS Code with extensions like Copilot or Continue.

By AI Coding Tools Directory2026-02-288 min read
Last reviewed: 2026-02-28
ACTD
AI Coding Tools Directory

Editorial Team

The AI Coding Tools Directory editorial team researches and reviews AI-powered development tools to help developers find the best solutions for their workflows.

Cursor is a VS Code fork with AI built in. VS Code stays neutral—you add Copilot, Continue, or other extensions. The real question: do you want an AI-first IDE or your current editor + AI extensions?

Quick Answer

Cursor for Composer, Agent mode, and 25+ models without extension setup. VS Code for staying in the standard editor and adding AI via extensions. Heavy multi-file and agent workflows? Cursor. Minimal change? VS Code + Copilot or Continue.

Feature Comparison Table

How they differ on AI integration and workflow:

Feature Cursor VS Code
Base VS Code fork Standard VS Code
AI Built-in (Tab, Composer, Agent) Via extensions (Copilot, Continue, etc.)
Multi-file AI editing Native Composer with diff review Copilot chat; Continue agent; no native Composer
Agent/autonomous Agent mode Extensions vary
Model choice 25+ models in one product Depends on extension (Copilot: managed; Continue: BYOK)
Extensions Most VS Code extensions work Full extension marketplace
Cost Hobby free; Pro $20/month Free; AI cost depends on extension
Familiarity VS Code-like UI Standard VS Code

Pricing and Value

Cursor

Plan Price What You Get
Hobby $0 2-week Pro trial, then limited
Pro $20/month Unlimited completions, 500 premium requests, all models

VS Code + AI Extensions

  • VS Code: Free
  • Copilot Free: 2,000 completions + 50 premium requests/month
  • Copilot Pro: $10/month
  • Continue: Free (open-source); you supply API keys
  • Other extensions: Varies

Best For

If you... Choose...
Want Composer and Agent without extension setup Cursor
Prefer standard VS Code for compliance or consistency VS Code + Copilot/Continue
Want model flexibility (GPT, Claude, Gemini) in one place Cursor
Need free AI with BYOK (bring your own key) VS Code + Continue
Work in a team that standardizes on VS Code VS Code + Copilot
Want lowest friction for AI completions VS Code + Copilot (install and go)
Need multi-file edits with structured diff review Cursor (Composer)

Final Verdict

Cursor if you want Composer and Agent and are willing to switch editors. VS Code + extensions if you prefer the standard editor and incremental AI. Both are valid; the split is workflow preference and how much you value Cursor’s native multi-file and agent features.

More options: AI IDE guide, best AI tools for VS Code.

Get the Weekly AI Tools Digest

New tools, comparisons, and insights delivered regularly. Join developers staying current with AI coding tools.

Workflow Resources

Cookbook

AI-Powered Code Review & Quality

Automate code review and enforce quality standards using AI-powered tools and agentic workflows.

Cookbook

Building AI-Powered Applications

Build applications powered by LLMs, RAG, and AI agents using Claude Code, Cursor, and modern AI frameworks.

Cookbook

Building APIs & Backends with AI Agents

Design and build robust APIs and backend services with AI coding agents, from REST to GraphQL.

Cookbook

Debugging with AI Agents

Systematically debug complex issues using AI coding agents with structured workflows and MCP integrations.

Skill

Change risk triage

A systematic method for categorizing AI-generated code changes by blast radius and required verification depth, preventing high-risk changes from shipping without adequate review.

Skill

Configuring MCP servers

A cross-tool guide to setting up Model Context Protocol servers in Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and VS Code, including server types, authentication, and common patterns.

Skill

Local model quality loop

Improve code output quality when using local AI models by combining rules files, iterative retries with error feedback, and test-backed validation gates.

Skill

Plan-implement-verify loop

A structured execution pattern for safe AI-assisted coding changes that prevents scope creep and ensures every edit is backed by test evidence.

MCP Server

AWS MCP Server

Open source MCP servers from AWS Labs that give AI coding agents access to AWS documentation, best practices, and contextual guidance for building on AWS.

MCP Server

Docker MCP Server

Docker MCP Gateway orchestrates MCP servers in isolated containers, providing secure discovery and execution of Model Context Protocol servers across AI coding tools.

MCP Server

Figma MCP Server

Official Figma MCP server that brings design context, variables, components, and Code Connect data into AI coding sessions for design-to-code workflows.

MCP Server

Firebase MCP Server

Experimental Firebase MCP server that gives AI coding agents access to Firestore, Auth, security rules, Cloud Messaging, and project management through the Firebase CLI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cursor just VS Code with AI?
Cursor is a fork of VS Code with AI deeply integrated: Tab completions, Composer for multi-file edits, and Agent mode. VS Code is the base editor; you add AI via extensions like GitHub Copilot or Continue.
Can I use VS Code extensions in Cursor?
Yes. Cursor supports most VS Code extensions, themes, and keybindings. It feels familiar if you already use VS Code.
Which is free?
VS Code is free. Cursor has a free Hobby tier with limits (2-week Pro trial, then capped usage). For unlimited AI in VS Code, use free extensions like Continue (BYOK) or Copilot Free (with limits).
When should I switch from VS Code to Cursor?
Consider Cursor if you want Composer for multi-file edits, Agent mode, and model choice without managing extensions. Stay with VS Code if you prefer your current setup with Copilot or Continue and minimal change.
Does Cursor replace VS Code?
Cursor is an alternative, not a drop-in replacement. You run Cursor as a separate app. Teams that standardize on VS Code may stick with extensions for consistency.