Comparison

Cursor vs Devin: AI IDE vs Autonomous Agent (2026)

A practical comparison of Cursor and Devin: in-IDE AI assistance versus autonomous ticket-to-PR agent. Different paradigms, different use cases.

By AI Coding Tools Directory2026-02-288 min read
Last reviewed: 2026-02-28
ACTD
AI Coding Tools Directory

Editorial Team

The AI Coding Tools Directory editorial team researches and reviews AI-powered development tools to help developers find the best solutions for their workflows.

Cursor and Devin occupy different roles: Cursor is an in-IDE assistant you drive; Devin is an autonomous agent that turns tickets into PRs.

Quick Answer

Cursor for active coding—Composer, Agent mode, model choice inside your IDE. Devin for autonomous ticket-to-PR execution from Slack, Linear, or Jira. Hands-on coding? Cursor. Offload backlog to an agent? Devin. Many teams use both.

Feature Comparison Table

Paradigm and primary use at a glance:

Feature Cursor Devin
Paradigm IDE assistant (you drive) Autonomous agent (ticket to PR)
Primary use Day-to-day coding in editor Backlog execution, ticket automation
Input Your prompts, edits, commands Slack, Linear, Jira tickets
Output Diffs, completions, agent actions Pull requests, validated changes
Pricing Public: Hobby free; Pro $20; Teams $40 Enterprise; contact sales
Form Desktop IDE (VS Code fork) Web platform, API
Integrations Editor, terminal, extensions Slack, Linear, Jira, Git
Hands-on High (you approve, edit, iterate) Low (agent runs; you review PRs)

Pricing and Value

Cursor

Plan Price What You Get
Hobby $0 Trial then limited
Pro $20/month Full IDE, all models
Pro+ $60/month Background agents
Teams $40/user/month SSO, admin

Devin

  • Enterprise product; pricing not public
  • Contact sales for access
  • Includes web IDE, agent sessions, Slack/Linear/Jira integration, repo indexing

Best For

If you... Choose...
Want an IDE for active coding Cursor
Need autonomous ticket-to-PR execution Devin
Prefer to approve every change Cursor (Composer, Agent)
Want to offload backlog to an agent Devin
Need predictable individual pricing Cursor
Have enterprise ticket workflows (Slack, Linear, Jira) Devin
Want both Use Cursor for coding, Devin for automation

Final Verdict

Cursor for hands-on coding with AI in the IDE. Devin for autonomous ticket-to-PR execution. They complement each other: Cursor for day-to-day work, Devin for backlog processing. Devin pricing is enterprise-only; Cursor has public tiers.

Further reading: Devin profile, Cursor profile, AI coding agents explained, competitive landscape.

Get the Weekly AI Tools Digest

New tools, comparisons, and insights delivered regularly. Join developers staying current with AI coding tools.

Workflow Resources

Cookbook

AI-Powered Code Review & Quality

Automate code review and enforce quality standards using AI-powered tools and agentic workflows.

Cookbook

Building AI-Powered Applications

Build applications powered by LLMs, RAG, and AI agents using Claude Code, Cursor, and modern AI frameworks.

Cookbook

Building APIs & Backends with AI Agents

Design and build robust APIs and backend services with AI coding agents, from REST to GraphQL.

Cookbook

Debugging with AI Agents

Systematically debug complex issues using AI coding agents with structured workflows and MCP integrations.

Skill

Change risk triage

A systematic method for categorizing AI-generated code changes by blast radius and required verification depth, preventing high-risk changes from shipping without adequate review.

Skill

Configuring MCP servers

A cross-tool guide to setting up Model Context Protocol servers in Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and VS Code, including server types, authentication, and common patterns.

Skill

Local model quality loop

Improve code output quality when using local AI models by combining rules files, iterative retries with error feedback, and test-backed validation gates.

Skill

Plan-implement-verify loop

A structured execution pattern for safe AI-assisted coding changes that prevents scope creep and ensures every edit is backed by test evidence.

MCP Server

AWS MCP Server

Open source MCP servers from AWS Labs that give AI coding agents access to AWS documentation, best practices, and contextual guidance for building on AWS.

MCP Server

Docker MCP Server

Docker MCP Gateway orchestrates MCP servers in isolated containers, providing secure discovery and execution of Model Context Protocol servers across AI coding tools.

MCP Server

Figma MCP Server

Official Figma MCP server that brings design context, variables, components, and Code Connect data into AI coding sessions for design-to-code workflows.

MCP Server

Firebase MCP Server

Experimental Firebase MCP server that gives AI coding agents access to Firestore, Auth, security rules, Cloud Messaging, and project management through the Firebase CLI.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Devin?
Devin is Cognition's autonomous software engineering platform. It ingests tickets from Slack, Linear, or Jira and produces validated pull requests. It operates as an agent rather than an in-IDE assistant.
Cursor vs Devin: can I use both?
Yes. Many teams use Cursor for day-to-day coding and Devin for autonomous ticket execution. They complement each other—Cursor for hands-on work, Devin for background or delegated tasks.
Which is more autonomous?
Devin is designed for autonomy: give it a ticket, it produces a PR. Cursor's Agent mode assists within the IDE with your approval. Devin operates more independently; Cursor keeps you in the loop.
How much does Devin cost?
Devin pricing is not publicly disclosed; it's sold as an enterprise product. Contact sales. Cursor has public tiers from free Hobby to $200/month Ultra.
Is Devin better than Cursor?
They solve different problems. Cursor is an IDE for active coding. Devin is an agent for ticket-to-PR automation. 'Better' depends on whether you need an IDE assistant or an autonomous backlog processor.